Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Imperfect Phase-Randomisation and Generalised Decoy-State Quantum Key Distribution

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2304.09401 v2 pith:BKZI3SWS submitted 2023-04-19 quant-ph

Imperfect Phase-Randomisation and Generalised Decoy-State Quantum Key Distribution

classification quant-ph
keywords laserdecoy-statepulsessourcesdistributeddistributionemithowever
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Decoy-state methods [1-3] are essential to perform quantum key distribution (QKD) at large distances in the absence of single photon sources. However, the standard techniques apply only if laser pulses are used that are independent and identically distributed (iid). Moreover, they require that the laser pulses are fully phase-randomised. However, realistic high-speed QKD setups do not meet these stringent requirements [4]. In this work, we generalise decoy-state analysis to accommodate laser sources that emit imperfectly phase-randomised states. We also develop theoretical tools to prove the security of protocols with lasers that emit pulses that are independent, but not identically distributed. These tools can be used with recent work [5] to prove the security of laser sources with correlated phase distributions as well. We quantitatively demonstrate the effect of imperfect phase-randomisation on key rates by computing the key rates for a simple implementation of the three-state protocol.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.