Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Interventional Probing in High Dimensions: An NLI Case Study

Computation and Language · Submitted 20 Apr 2023

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Furthermore, we delve into the limitations of these methods and outline some pitfalls have been obscuring the effectivity of interventional probing studies.

how it is stated · asserted 0.95 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2304.10346 (version 1)
Pith IDVHDG56KZ, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAndre Freitas, Julia Rozanova, Lucas Cordeiro, Marco Valentino. "Interventional Probing in High Dimensions: An NLI Case Study." arXiv:2304.10346 (2023). https://pith.science/paper/VHDG56KZ
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,797 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.06 · states limitation 0.79 · human participants 0.03 · controlled comparison 0.14 · randomized assignment 0.02 · states quantitative result 0.03 · compares with prior results 0.33 · mentions code or data availability 0.03.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Probing strategies have been shown to detect the presence of various linguistic features in large language models; in particular, semantic features intermediate to the "natural logic" fragment of the Natural Language Inference task (NLI). In the case of natural logic, the relation between the intermediate features and the entailment label is explicitly known: as such, this provides a ripe setting for interventional studies on the NLI models' representations, allowing for stronger causal conjectures and a deeper critical analysis of interventional probing methods. In this work, we carry out new and existing representation-level interventions to investigate the effect of these semantic features on NLI classification: we perform amnesic probing (which removes features as directed by learned linear probes) and introduce the mnestic probing variation (which forgets all dimensions except the probe-selected ones). Furthermore, we delve into the limitations of these methods and outline some pitfalls have been obscuring the effectivity of interventional probing studies.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Probing strategies have been shown to detect the presence of various linguistic features in large language models; in particular, semantic features intermediate to the "natural logic" fragment of the Natural Language Inference task (NLI). background 1.00 0.05 0.03 asserted 1.00
s1 In the case of natural logic, the relation between the intermediate features and the entailment label is explicitly known: as such, this provides a ripe setting for interventional studies on the NLI models' representations, allowing for stronger causal conjectures and a deeper critical analysis of interventional probing methods. background 0.95 0.07 0.06 asserted 0.96
s2 In this work, we carry out new and existing representation-level interventions to investigate the effect of these semantic features on NLI classification: we perform amnesic probing (which removes features as directed by learned linear probes) and introduce the mnestic probing variation (which forgets all dimensions except the probe-selected ones). method 0.69 0.95 0.08 asserted 0.99
s3 Furthermore, we delve into the limitations of these methods and outline some pitfalls have been obscuring the effectivity of interventional probing studies. contribution 0.57 0.58 0.13 asserted 0.95

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 0.84 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.94.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Probing strategies have been shown to detect the presence of various linguistic features in large language models; in particular, semantic features intermediate to the "natural logic" fragment of the Natural Language Inference task (NLI). In the case of natural logic, the relation between the intermediate features and the entailment label is explicitly known: as such, this provides a ripe setting for interventional studies on the NLI models' representations, allowing for stronger causal conjectures and a deeper critical analysis of interventional probing methods. In this work, we carry out new and existing representation-level interventions to investigate the effect of these semantic features on NLI classification: we perform amnesic probing (which removes features as directed by learned linear probes) and introduce the mnestic probing variation (which forgets all dimensions except the probe-selected ones). Furthermore, we delve into the limitations of these methods and outline some pitfalls have been obscuring the effectivity of interventional probing studies.

Human review
How the literature uses it

2 arXiv papers cite this in 3 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites · 15 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 1 paper
Uses data or values from 2 papers
Cites as support 2 papers
  • In [ref] and [ref] , it is shown that when roberta-large-mnli (a model which performs well on benchmarks but poorly on the targeted NLI_XY challenge set) receives additional training on the adversarial HELP dataset [ref] it improves in NLI_XY performance and begins to show high probing performance for the relevant intermediate features, context monotonicity and lexical relations: this is the necessary precondition for doing interventional probing.

    Supporting Context Monotonicity Abstractions in Neural NLI Models · NLI Models and Encoding · 0.96

  • In [ref] and [ref] , it is shown that when roberta-large-mnli (a model which performs well on benchmarks but poorly on the targeted NLI_XY challenge set) receives additional training on the adversarial HELP dataset [ref] it improves in NLI_XY performance and begins to show high probing performance for the relevant intermediate features, context monotonicity and lexical relations: this is the necessary precondition for doing interventional probing.

    Decomposing Natural Logic Inferences in Neural NLI · NLI Models and Encoding · 0.96

Cites as background 2 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.