Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Seeing is not always believing: Benchmarking Human and Model Perception of AI-Generated Images

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2304.13023 v3 pith:CXNL3Z5L submitted 2023-04-25 cs.AI cs.CV

classification cs.AIcs.CV
keywords ai-generatedhumanevaluationfakeimagesinformationmodelphotos
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Photos serve as a way for humans to record what they experience in their daily lives, and they are often regarded as trustworthy sources of information. However, there is a growing concern that the advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) technology may produce fake photos, which can create confusion and diminish trust in photographs. This study aims to comprehensively evaluate agents for distinguishing state-of-the-art AI-generated visual content. Our study benchmarks both human capability and cutting-edge fake image detection AI algorithms, using a newly collected large-scale fake image dataset Fake2M. In our human perception evaluation, titled HPBench, we discovered that humans struggle significantly to distinguish real photos from AI-generated ones, with a misclassification rate of 38.7%. Along with this, we conduct the model capability of AI-Generated images detection evaluation MPBench and the top-performing model from MPBench achieves a 13% failure rate under the same setting used in the human evaluation. We hope that our study can raise awareness of the potential risks of AI-generated images and facilitate further research to prevent the spread of false information. More information can refer to https://github.com/Inf-imagine/Sentry.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Few-Shot Synthetic Image Attribution: Identifying Unseen Generators with Limited Samples

    cs.CV 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    OmniDFA performs few-shot, open-set attribution of AI-generated images, identifying the source generator from just five support samples across 45 known and unseen generators.

  2. Modeling Human Responses to Multimodal AI Content

    cs.AI 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    A 154K-post study reports that humans identify AI content best when text and images are both present and inconsistent, and offers metrics plus an LLM agent for human-aligned responses.

Pith tools