Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Safe Deployment for Counterfactual Learning to Rank with Exposure-Based Risk Minimization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.01522 v1 pith:KTD3JMUU submitted 2023-04-26 cs.IR cs.LG

classification cs.IRcs.LG
keywords cltrexposure-basedriskdeploymenthighmethodmethodsmodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Counterfactual learning to rank (CLTR) relies on exposure-based inverse propensity scoring (IPS), a LTR-specific adaptation of IPS to correct for position bias. While IPS can provide unbiased and consistent estimates, it often suffers from high variance. Especially when little click data is available, this variance can cause CLTR to learn sub-optimal ranking behavior. Consequently, existing CLTR methods bring significant risks with them, as naively deploying their models can result in very negative user experiences. We introduce a novel risk-aware CLTR method with theoretical guarantees for safe deployment. We apply a novel exposure-based concept of risk regularization to IPS estimation for LTR. Our risk regularization penalizes the mismatch between the ranking behavior of a learned model and a given safe model. Thereby, it ensures that learned ranking models stay close to a trusted model, when there is high uncertainty in IPS estimation, which greatly reduces the risks during deployment. Our experimental results demonstrate the efficacy of our proposed method, which is effective at avoiding initial periods of bad performance when little data is available, while also maintaining high performance at convergence. For the CLTR field, our novel exposure-based risk minimization method enables practitioners to adopt CLTR methods in a safer manner that mitigates many of the risks attached to previous methods.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Addressing Personalized Bias for Unbiased Learning to Rank

    cs.IR 2025-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A user-aware inverse-propensity estimator corrects personalized bias in learning to rank from click logs, with proofs of unbiasedness and lower variance.

  2. Document Similarity Enhanced IPS Estimation for Unbiased Learning to Rank

    cs.IR 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    IPSsim adds a similarity-to-top-documents term to the IPS weight and achieves small NDCG improvements in large top-n settings on simulated click benchmarks.

Pith tools