Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

The local validity of special relativity from a scale-relative perspective

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.01534 v3 pith:BPJAYWJK submitted 2023-05-02 physics.hist-ph gr-qc

classification physics.hist-phgr-qc
keywords localvalidityrelativityconceptsmathematicalmodellingspecialstandard
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Most contemporary physicists hold that the local validity of special relativity (SR) within general relativity (GR) is expressed by means of an interdependent cluster of mathematical concepts, one of which is the existence of normal coordinate systems. Nonetheless, there remains conceptual work to be done with regard to this `standard story' on the local validity of SR in (a) clarifying how a network of mathematical concepts is recruited in a particular modelling context in order to account for the local validity of SR within GR, and (b) highlighting the richness and subtlety of this mode of modelling, as well as the way in which it interacts with the concept of `approximate Killing symmetry'. With this paper, we carry out this work, thereby also defending the standard story from concerns recently voiced in the philosophy of physics literature.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Is spacetime curved? Assessing the underdetermination of general relativity and teleparallel gravity

    physics.hist-ph 2025-04 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper defends the view that general relativity and teleparallel gravity are genuinely underdetermined alternatives, countering Knox's arguments that teleparallel gravity's ontology reduces to that of general relativity.

Pith tools