Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 cited by

Visual Chain of Thought: Bridging Logical Gaps with Multimodal Infillings

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.02317 v3 pith:GGXVXXTC submitted 2023-05-03 cs.CL cs.CV

classification cs.CLcs.CV
keywords reasoningmodelsvisualchain-of-thoughtgapslogicalnoveltasks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent advances in large language models elicit reasoning in a chain-of-thought that allows models to decompose problems in a human-like fashion. Though this paradigm improves multi-step reasoning ability in language models, it is limited by being unimodal and applied mainly to question-answering tasks. We claim that incorporating visual augmentation into reasoning is essential, especially for complex, imaginative tasks. Consequently, we introduce VCoT, a novel method that leverages chain-of-thought prompting with vision-language grounding to recursively bridge the logical gaps within sequential data. Our method uses visual guidance to generate synthetic multimodal infillings that add consistent and novel information to reduce the logical gaps for downstream tasks that can benefit from temporal reasoning, as well as provide interpretability into models' multi-step reasoning. We apply VCoT to the Visual Storytelling and WikiHow summarization datasets and demonstrate through human evaluation that VCoT offers novel and consistent synthetic data augmentation beating chain-of-thought baselines, which can be used to enhance downstream performance.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Point-RFT: Improving Multimodal Reasoning with Visually Grounded Reinforcement Finetuning

    cs.CV 2025-05 reject novelty 7.0 of 10

    Point-RFT uses point-grounded chain-of-thought with GRPO reinforcement to improve chart reasoning, reporting 90.04% on ChartQA, though internal tables and the OOD setup weaken the claim.

  2. MagiC: Evaluating Multimodal Cognition Toward Grounded Visual Reasoning

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MagiC evaluates answer correctness, reasoning validity, grounding fidelity, and self-correction on about 900 hand-annotated visual questions across 15 vision-language models.

  3. ViCrit: A Verifiable Reinforcement Learning Proxy Task for Visual Perception in VLMs

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A verifiable RL proxy task that asks VLMs to locate a single injected hallucination in a 200-word caption improves visual perception and transfers to math and abstract reasoning benchmarks.

  4. Argus Inspection: Do Multimodal Large Language Models Possess the Eye of Panoptes?

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A new 1,430-item multimodal benchmark shows that leading multimodal LLMs rarely notice small visual traps needed for commonsense safety reasoning, with top scores near 0.46 on a scale whose maximum is about 0.97.

  5. Argus: Vision-Centric Reasoning with Grounded Chain-of-Thought

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Argus adds explicit language-guided visual attention to multimodal LLMs by grounding questions to bounding boxes and re-engaging those regions, improving vision-centric reasoning and grounding accuracy.

  6. Less is More Tokens: Efficient Math Reasoning via Difficulty-Aware Chain-of-Thought Distillation

    cs.CL 2025-09 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Difficulty-aware compression of CoT traces plus SFT and DPO lets LLMs shorten reasoning on easy math problems, cutting tokens by up to 30% with mixed accuracy effects.

Pith tools