REVIEW 2 cited by
PTP: Boosting Stability and Performance of Prompt Tuning with Perturbation-Based Regularizer
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Recent studies show that prompt tuning can better leverage the power of large language models than fine-tuning on downstream natural language understanding tasks. However, the existing prompt tuning methods have training instability issues, as the variance of scores under different random seeds is quite large. To address this critical problem, we first investigate and find that the loss landscape of vanilla prompt tuning is precipitous when it is visualized, where a slight change of input data can cause a big fluctuation in the loss landscape. This is an essential factor that leads to the instability of prompt tuning. Based on this observation, we introduce perturbation-based regularizers, which can smooth the loss landscape, into prompt tuning. We propose a new algorithm, called Prompt Tuning with Perturbation-based regularizer~(PTP), which can not only alleviate training instability dramatically but also boost the performance of prompt tuning. We design two kinds of perturbation-based regularizers, including random-noise-based and adversarial-based. In particular, our proposed perturbations are flexible on both text space and embedding space. Extensive experiments show the effectiveness of our proposed methods in stabilizing the training. Our new algorithms improve the state-of-the-art prompt tuning methods by 1.94\% and 2.34\% on SuperGLUE and FewGLUE benchmarks, respectively.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
PEFT A2Z: Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning Survey for Large Language and Vision Models
A survey that organizes PEFT methods into additive, selective, reparameterized, hybrid, and unified families, but with no new method or verified experiments.
-
Survey of different Large Language Model Architectures: Trends, Benchmarks, and Challenges
A broad but error-prone survey of LLM and MLLM architectures, training methods, benchmarks, and challenges.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.