REVIEW 2 cited by
Multi-View Graph Representation Learning for Answering Hybrid Numerical Reasoning Question
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Hybrid question answering (HybridQA) over the financial report contains both textual and tabular data, and requires the model to select the appropriate evidence for the numerical reasoning task. Existing methods based on encoder-decoder framework employ a expression tree-based decoder to solve numerical reasoning problems. However, encoders rely more on Machine Reading Comprehension (MRC) methods, which take table serialization and text splicing as input, damaging the granularity relationship between table and text as well as the spatial structure information of table itself. In order to solve these problems, the paper proposes a Multi-View Graph (MVG) Encoder to take the relations among the granularity into account and capture the relations from multiple view. By utilizing MVGE as a module, we constuct Tabular View, Relation View and Numerical View which aim to retain the original characteristics of the hybrid data. We validate our model on the publicly available table-text hybrid QA benchmark (TAT-QA) and outperform the state-of-the-art model.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Multiview Graph Fusion with Covariates
Hierarchical Bayesian multiview graph-on-covariates regression with shared spike-and-slab node selection, low-rank edge coefficients, posterior predictive consistency, and fMRI cognitive-control application.
-
CF-RAG: A Dataset and Method for Carbon Footprint QA Using Retrieval-Augmented Generation
A fine-tuned Llama 3 model with a trained document critic and program-based reasoning beats GPT-4o and other baselines on a new carbon footprint QA benchmark.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.