REVIEW 2 cited by
Are ChatGPT and GPT-4 General-Purpose Solvers for Financial Text Analytics? A Study on Several Typical Tasks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The most recent large language models(LLMs) such as ChatGPT and GPT-4 have shown exceptional capabilities of generalist models, achieving state-of-the-art performance on a wide range of NLP tasks with little or no adaptation. How effective are such models in the financial domain? Understanding this basic question would have a significant impact on many downstream financial analytical tasks. In this paper, we conduct an empirical study and provide experimental evidences of their performance on a wide variety of financial text analytical problems, using eight benchmark datasets from five categories of tasks. We report both the strengths and limitations of the current models by comparing them to the state-of-the-art fine-tuned approaches and the recently released domain-specific pretrained models. We hope our study can help understand the capability of the existing models in the financial domain and facilitate further improvements.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Weak-to-Strong GraphRAG: Aligning Weak Retrievers with Large Language Models for Graph-based Retrieval Augmented Generation
ReG refines weak graph-retriever supervision with LLM-selected reasoning chains and reorganizes retrieved triples into coherent evidence chains, improving KGQA accuracy, data efficiency, and reasoning token efficiency.
-
Assessing the Capabilities and Limitations of FinGPT Model in Financial NLP Applications
FinGPT matches GPT-4 on financial sentiment and headline classification, lags on QA and NER, and shows a bullish bias in stock movement prediction.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.