Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Beyond Prompts: Exploring the Design Space of Mixed-Initiative Co-Creativity Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.07465 v1 pith:PKG5GOI3 submitted 2023-05-03 cs.AI

Beyond Prompts: Exploring the Design Space of Mixed-Initiative Co-Creativity Systems

classification cs.AI
keywords systemsdesignhumanspacecontentmi-ccco-creativitycoverage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Generative Artificial Intelligence systems have been developed for image, code, story, and game generation with the goal of facilitating human creativity. Recent work on neural generative systems has emphasized one particular means of interacting with AI systems: the user provides a specification, usually in the form of prompts, and the AI system generates the content. However, there are other configurations of human and AI coordination, such as co-creativity (CC) in which both human and AI systems can contribute to content creation, and mixed-initiative (MI) in which both human and AI systems can initiate content changes. In this paper, we define a hypothetical human-AI configuration design space consisting of different means for humans and AI systems to communicate creative intent to each other. We conduct a human participant study with 185 participants to understand how users want to interact with differently configured MI-CC systems. We find out that MI-CC systems with more extensive coverage of the design space are rated higher or on par on a variety of creative and goal-completion metrics, demonstrating that wider coverage of the design space can improve user experience and achievement when using the system; Preference varies greatly between expertise groups, suggesting the development of adaptive, personalized MI-CC systems; Participants identified new design space dimensions including scrutability -- the ability to poke and prod at models -- and explainability.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. When Constraints Limit and Inspire: Characterizing Presentation Authoring Practices for Evolving Narratives

    cs.HC 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Presenters treat constraints as active guides for building and reusing slide narratives across sessions, supported by the new CMPA framework and ReSlide tool that improves constraint-aware authoring compared to baselines.

  2. Vibe Coding in Product Teams: Reconfiguring AI-Assisted Workflows, Prototyping, and Collaboration

    cs.HC 2025-09 accept novelty 5.0

    Interviews reveal a four-stage vibe coding workflow that accelerates prototyping while introducing tensions between quick efficiency and reflective design intention, plus asymmetries in trust and ownership.