Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Generative and Pseudo-Relevant Feedback for Sparse, Dense and Learned Sparse Retrieval

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.07477 v1 pith:B42TDWW6 submitted 2023-05-12 cs.IR

Generative and Pseudo-Relevant Feedback for Sparse, Dense and Learned Sparse Retrieval

classification cs.IR
keywords retrievalfeedbackquerysparsefirst-passbenefitsdenseexperiments
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Pseudo-relevance feedback (PRF) is a classical approach to address lexical mismatch by enriching the query using first-pass retrieval. Moreover, recent work on generative-relevance feedback (GRF) shows that query expansion models using text generated from large language models can improve sparse retrieval without depending on first-pass retrieval effectiveness. This work extends GRF to dense and learned sparse retrieval paradigms with experiments over six standard document ranking benchmarks. We find that GRF improves over comparable PRF techniques by around 10% on both precision and recall-oriented measures. Nonetheless, query analysis shows that GRF and PRF have contrasting benefits, with GRF providing external context not present in first-pass retrieval, whereas PRF grounds the query to the information contained within the target corpus. Thus, we propose combining generative and pseudo-relevance feedback ranking signals to achieve the benefits of both feedback classes, which significantly increases recall over PRF methods on 95% of experiments.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Test-Time Compute for Frozen Embedding Models through Agentic Program Search

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Agentic program search over frozen embedding APIs yields a parameter-free inference algebra—a softmax-weighted centroid of top-K documents interpolated with the query—that lifts nDCG@10 across seven model families on ...

  2. Test-Time Compute for Frozen Embedding Models through Agentic Program Search

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A softmax-weighted centroid of the local top-K documents interpolated with the query improves nDCG@10 for frozen embedding models across seven families on held-out BEIR data.

  3. When More Reformulations Hurt: Avoiding Drift using Ranker Feedback

    cs.IR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    ReformIR adaptively prioritizes reformulations and documents with a surrogate model guided by ranker feedback to boost recall while suppressing drift under fixed reranking budgets.

  4. Test-Time Compute for Frozen Embedding Models through Agentic Program Search

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Agentic program search over a frozen encoder API yields retrieval programs that improve nDCG@10 on held-out tasks and unseen encoder families with no per-domain training.