REVIEW 1 cited by
Learn to Unlearn: A Survey on Machine Unlearning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Machine Learning (ML) models have been shown to potentially leak sensitive information, thus raising privacy concerns in ML-driven applications. This inspired recent research on removing the influence of specific data samples from a trained ML model. Such efficient removal would enable ML to comply with the "right to be forgotten" in many legislation, and could also address performance bottlenecks from low-quality or poisonous samples. In that context, machine unlearning methods have been proposed to erase the contributions of designated data samples on models, as an alternative to the often impracticable approach of retraining models from scratch. This article presents a comprehensive review of recent machine unlearning techniques, verification mechanisms, and potential attacks. We further highlight emerging challenges and prospective research directions (e.g. resilience and fairness concerns). We aim for this paper to provide valuable resources for integrating privacy, equity, andresilience into ML systems and help them "learn to unlearn".
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
iShumei-Chinchunmei at SemEval-2025 Task 4: A balanced forgetting and retention multi-task framework using effective unlearning loss
The authors propose Effective Unlearning Loss, the inverse of the standard next-token prediction loss, within a multi-task framework, and report a 5th-place finish at SemEval-2025 Task 4.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.