Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Neurosymbolic AI and its Taxonomy: a survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.08876 v2 pith:OR7TCWI6 submitted 2023-05-12 cs.NE cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.NEcs.AIcs.LG
keywords modelsareaneurosymbolicsurveyalternativeapplicationsartificialbrings
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Neurosymbolic AI deals with models that combine symbolic processing, like classic AI, and neural networks, as it's a very established area. These models are emerging as an effort toward Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) by both exploring an alternative to just increasing datasets' and models' sizes and combining Learning over the data distribution, Reasoning on prior and learned knowledge, and by symbiotically using them. This survey investigates research papers in this area during recent years and brings classification and comparison between the presented models as well as applications.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CoreThink: A Symbolic Reasoning Layer to reason over Long Horizon Tasks with LLMs

    cs.AI 2025-08 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    The paper claims a symbolic orchestration layer, CoreThink, achieves state-of-the-art results on seven coding and reasoning benchmarks with no training, but provides no verifiable implementation or method details.

Pith tools