Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Convex optimization over a probability simplex

Optimization and Control · Submitted 15 May 2023

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim In continuous time, we prove that $f(x_T)-f(x^*) = {O}(1/T)$ for differentiable real-valued convex functions, where $T$ is the number of time steps and $w^*$ is the optimal solution.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2305.09046 (version 2)
Pith IDAL44ZFE5, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationGeoffrey M. Vasil, James Chok. "Convex optimization over a probability simplex." arXiv:2305.09046 (2023). https://pith.science/paper/AL44ZFE5
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,734 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.09 · states limitation 0.09 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.28 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.97 · compares with prior results 0.82 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We propose a new iteration scheme, the Cauchy-Simplex, to optimize convex problems over the probability simplex $\{w\in\mathbb{R}^n\ |\ \sum_i w_i=1\ \textrm{and}\ w_i\geq0\}$. Specifically, we map the simplex to the positive quadrant of a unit sphere, envisage gradient descent in latent variables, and map the result back in a way that only depends on the simplex variable. Moreover, proving rigorous convergence results in this formulation leads inherently to tools from information theory (e.g., cross-entropy and KL divergence). Each iteration of the Cauchy-Simplex consists of simple operations, making it well-suited for high-dimensional problems. In continuous time, we prove that $f(x_T)-f(x^*) = {O}(1/T)$ for differentiable real-valued convex functions, where $T$ is the number of time steps and $w^*$ is the optimal solution. Numerical experiments of projection onto convex hulls show faster convergence than similar algorithms. Finally, we apply our algorithm to online learning problems and prove the convergence of the average regret for (1) Prediction with expert advice and (2) Universal Portfolios.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We propose a new iteration scheme, the Cauchy-Simplex, to optimize convex problems over the probability simplex $\{w\in\mathbb{R}^n\ |\ \sum_i w_i=1\ \textrm{and}\ w_i\geq0\}$. contribution 0.98 0.93 0.33 asserted 1.00
s1 Specifically, we map the simplex to the positive quadrant of a unit sphere, envisage gradient descent in latent variables, and map the result back in a way that only depends on the simplex variable. method 0.99 0.92 0.06 asserted 0.98
s2 Moreover, proving rigorous convergence results in this formulation leads inherently to tools from information theory (e.g., cross-entropy and KL divergence). interpretation 0.55 0.78 0.07 asserted 0.99
s3 Each iteration of the Cauchy-Simplex consists of simple operations, making it well-suited for high-dimensional problems. method 0.35 0.65 0.07 asserted 0.95
s4 In continuous time, we prove that $f(x_T)-f(x^*) = {O}(1/T)$ for differentiable real-valued convex functions, where $T$ is the number of time steps and $w^*$ is the optimal solution. result 0.99 0.94 0.27 asserted 1.00
s5 Numerical experiments of projection onto convex hulls show faster convergence than similar algorithms. result 1.00 0.92 0.10 asserted 1.00
s6 Finally, we apply our algorithm to online learning problems and prove the convergence of the average regret for (1) Prediction with expert advice and (2) Universal Portfolios. contribution 0.54 0.95 0.19 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We propose a new iteration scheme, the Cauchy-Simplex, to optimize convex problems over the probability simplex $\{w\in\mathbb{R}^n\ |\ \sum_i w_i=1\ \textrm{and}\ w_i\geq0\}$. Specifically, we map the simplex to the positive quadrant of a unit sphere, envisage gradient descent in latent variables, and map the result back in a way that only depends on the simplex variable. Moreover, proving rigorous convergence results in this formulation leads inherently to tools from information theory (e.g., cross-entropy and KL divergence). Each iteration of the Cauchy-Simplex consists of simple operations, making it well-suited for high-dimensional problems. In continuous time, we prove that $f(x_T)-f(x^*) = {O}(1/T)$ for differentiable real-valued convex functions, where $T$ is the number of time steps and $w^*$ is the optimal solution. Numerical experiments of projection onto convex hulls show faster convergence than similar algorithms. Finally, we apply our algorithm to online learning problems and prove the convergence of the average regret for (1) Prediction with expert advice and (2) Universal Portfolios.

Human review
How the literature uses it

2 arXiv papers cite this in 4 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 1 sentence without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.