REVIEW 2 cited by
A Survey on Causal Discovery: Theory and Practice
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Understanding the laws that govern a phenomenon is the core of scientific progress. This is especially true when the goal is to model the interplay between different aspects in a causal fashion. Indeed, causal inference itself is specifically designed to quantify the underlying relationships that connect a cause to its effect. Causal discovery is a branch of the broader field of causality in which causal graphs are recovered from data (whenever possible), enabling the identification and estimation of causal effects. In this paper, we explore recent advancements in causal discovery in a unified manner, provide a consistent overview of existing algorithms developed under different settings, report useful tools and data, present real-world applications to understand why and how these methods can be fruitfully exploited.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Intuitionistic $j$-Do-Calculus in Topos Causal Models
The authors define j-stable causal independence and three inference rules (J1-J3) that generalize Pearl's do-calculus to the internal intuitionistic logic of a sheaf topos.
-
Decentralized Causal Discovery using Judo Calculus
Running standard causal-discovery methods per regime and keeping only edges that persist across regimes ('j-stable aggregation') improves precision and parallelism over pooled fits.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.