Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Are You Copying My Model? Protecting the Copyright of Large Language Models for EaaS via Backdoor Watermark

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.10036 v3 pith:7EEOPPTR submitted 2023-05-17 cs.CL cs.CY

classification cs.CLcs.CY
keywords eaascopyrightllmsmodelswatermarkbackdoorembeddingembeddings
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated powerful capabilities in both text understanding and generation. Companies have begun to offer Embedding as a Service (EaaS) based on these LLMs, which can benefit various natural language processing (NLP) tasks for customers. However, previous studies have shown that EaaS is vulnerable to model extraction attacks, which can cause significant losses for the owners of LLMs, as training these models is extremely expensive. To protect the copyright of LLMs for EaaS, we propose an Embedding Watermark method called EmbMarker that implants backdoors on embeddings. Our method selects a group of moderate-frequency words from a general text corpus to form a trigger set, then selects a target embedding as the watermark, and inserts it into the embeddings of texts containing trigger words as the backdoor. The weight of insertion is proportional to the number of trigger words included in the text. This allows the watermark backdoor to be effectively transferred to EaaS-stealer's model for copyright verification while minimizing the adverse impact on the original embeddings' utility. Our extensive experiments on various datasets show that our method can effectively protect the copyright of EaaS models without compromising service quality.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Optimizing Token Choice for Code Watermarking: An RL Approach

    cs.CR 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    An RL-trained policy adaptively biases token choices to watermark LLM-generated code while preserving executable behavior.

  2. CoTSRF: Utilize Chain of Thought as Stealthy and Robust Fingerprint of Large Language Models

    cs.CR 2025-05 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    CoTSRF fingerprints a source LLM by training a contrastive encoder on chain-of-thought responses, then flags suspect APIs whose reasoning-style feature distances are too close to the source's distribution.

  3. ISACL: Internal State Analyzer for Copyrighted Training Data Leakage

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An MLP trained on LLM internal states predicts Rouge-L-defined literal copying leakage with high accuracy, but not paraphrase-level leakage.

Pith tools