Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Evaluation Metrics for DNNs Compression

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.10616 v4 pith:HEV7SLOM submitted 2023-05-18 cs.LG cs.CV

classification cs.LGcs.CV
keywords compressionevaluationmetricsdifferentexistinghardwarenetzipneural
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

There is a lot of ongoing research effort into developing different techniques for neural networks compression. However, the community lacks standardised evaluation metrics, which are key to identifying the most suitable compression technique for different applications. This paper reviews existing neural network compression evaluation metrics and implements them into a standardisation framework called NetZIP. We introduce two novel metrics to cover existing gaps of evaluation in the literature: 1) Compression and Hardware Agnostic Theoretical Speed (CHATS) and 2) Overall Compression Success (OCS). We demonstrate the use of NetZIP using two case studies on two different hardware platforms (a PC and a Raspberry Pi 4) focusing on object classification and object detection.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools