Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Relabeling Minimal Training Subset to Flip a Prediction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.12809 v4 pith:4MSUO6I4 submitted 2023-05-22 cs.LG cs.AIstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIstat.ML
keywords trainingpredictionsubsetflipmathcalmodelpointsrelabeling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

When facing an unsatisfactory prediction from a machine learning model, users can be interested in investigating the underlying reasons and exploring the potential for reversing the outcome. We ask: To flip the prediction on a test point $x_t$, how to identify the smallest training subset $\mathcal{S}_t$ that we need to relabel? We propose an efficient algorithm to identify and relabel such a subset via an extended influence function for binary classification models with convex loss. We find that relabeling fewer than 2% of the training points can always flip a prediction. This mechanism can serve multiple purposes: (1) providing an approach to challenge a model prediction by altering training points; (2) evaluating model robustness with the cardinality of the subset (i.e., $|\mathcal{S}_t|$); we show that $|\mathcal{S}_t|$ is highly related to the noise ratio in the training set and $|\mathcal{S}_t|$ is correlated with but complementary to predicted probabilities; and (3) revealing training points lead to group attribution bias. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to investigate identifying and relabeling the minimal training subset required to flip a given prediction.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Detecting Mislabeled and Corrupted Data via Pointwise Mutual Information

    cs.LG 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Samples with low pointwise mutual information between image and label are mostly mislabeled or corrupted, and dropping them before training improves MNIST accuracy by up to 15%.

Pith tools