Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Enhanced Meta Label Correction for Coping with Label Corruption

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.12961 v2 pith:6UVBDZ3D submitted 2023-05-22 cs.CV cs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.LG
keywords correctionemlclabellabelslearningnoisyapproachapproaches
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Traditional methods for learning with the presence of noisy labels have successfully handled datasets with artificially injected noise but still fall short of adequately handling real-world noise. With the increasing use of meta-learning in the diverse fields of machine learning, researchers leveraged auxiliary small clean datasets to meta-correct the training labels. Nonetheless, existing meta-label correction approaches are not fully exploiting their potential. In this study, we propose an Enhanced Meta Label Correction approach abbreviated as EMLC for the learning with noisy labels (LNL) problem. We re-examine the meta-learning process and introduce faster and more accurate meta-gradient derivations. We propose a novel teacher architecture tailored explicitly to the LNL problem, equipped with novel training objectives. EMLC outperforms prior approaches and achieves state-of-the-art results in all standard benchmarks. Notably, EMLC enhances the previous art on the noisy real-world dataset Clothing1M by $1.52\%$ while requiring $\times 0.5$ the time per epoch and with much faster convergence of the meta-objective when compared to the baseline approach.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Trust & Safety of LLMs and LLMs in Trust & Safety

    cs.AI 2024-12 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    A survey of LLM trust and safety research and LLM applications in trust and safety, with a best-practices workflow that is asserted rather than proven.

Pith tools