REVIEW 3 cited by
The Knowledge Alignment Problem: Bridging Human and External Knowledge for Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large language models often necessitate grounding on external knowledge to generate faithful and reliable answers. Yet even with the correct groundings in the reference, they can ignore them and rely on wrong groundings or their inherent biases to hallucinate when users, being largely unaware of the specifics of the stored information, pose questions that might not directly correlate with the retrieved groundings. In this work, we formulate this knowledge alignment problem and introduce MixAlign, a framework that interacts with both the human user and the knowledge base to obtain and integrate clarifications on how the user question relates to the stored information. MixAlign employs a language model to achieve automatic knowledge alignment and, if necessary, further enhances this alignment through human user clarifications. Experimental results highlight the crucial role of knowledge alignment in boosting model performance and mitigating hallucination, with improvements noted up to 22.2% and 27.1% respectively. We also demonstrate the effectiveness of MixAlign in improving knowledge alignment by producing high-quality, user-centered clarifications.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
CausalAbstain: Enhancing Multilingual LLMs with Causal Reasoning for Trustworthy Abstention
CausalAbstain filters multilingual self-feedback by comparing how much it changes the model's abstention decision, improving abstention accuracy over baselines on two benchmarks.
-
RAGPPI: RAG Benchmark for Protein-Protein Interactions in Drug Discovery
RAGPPI introduces a QA benchmark for PPI biological impacts in drug target identification, with 500 expert-validated and 3,720 auto-labeled pairs (sum 4,220, though the abstract says 4,420).
-
Amulet: Putting Complex Multi-Turn Conversations on the Stand with LLM Juries
Dialog-act and maxim-aware prompting improves LLM judge accuracy on multi-turn preference data by up to 8 points, with further gains from jury-style voting.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.