Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Automatic Model Selection with Large Language Models for Reasoning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.14333 v2 pith:KCH74TUY submitted 2023-05-23 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords languagemethodmodelreasoningfurtherlargemodelsperformance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Chain-of-Thought (CoT) and Program-Aided Language Models (PAL) represent two distinct reasoning methods, each with its own strengths. CoT employs natural language, offering flexibility and interpretability, while PAL utilizes programming language, yielding more structured and rigorous logic. We introduce a model selection method to combine the best of both worlds by employing a large language model (LLM) to dynamically select between them. Our theoretical analysis underscores the feasibility of this method, which is further corroborated by empirical results. Our proposed method demonstrates significant performance improvements across eight reasoning datasets with Codex, ChatGPT, and GPT-4. Additionally, our method is complementary to self-consistency; when integrated, it can further enhance performance while significantly reducing computation costs. Moreover, we achieve new state-of-the-art results on GSM8K and SVAMP, with respective accuracies of 96.8% and 93.7%. Our code, data and prompts are available at https://github.com/XuZhao0/Model-Selection-Reasoning

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. RepLLM: Toward Automatically Reproducing Network Research Results

    cs.NI 2025-09 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    The headline claim, that RepLLM reproduces 95% of benchmarks in two hours with 10% token savings, is absent from the body, which instead reports a different, semi-automated system with no baseline comparison.

Pith tools