REVIEW 1 cited by
Run Like a Girl! Sports-Related Gender Bias in Language and Vision
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Gender bias in Language and Vision datasets and models has the potential to perpetuate harmful stereotypes and discrimination. We analyze gender bias in two Language and Vision datasets. Consistent with prior work, we find that both datasets underrepresent women, which promotes their invisibilization. Moreover, we hypothesize and find that a bias affects human naming choices for people playing sports: speakers produce names indicating the sport (e.g. 'tennis player' or 'surfer') more often when it is a man or a boy participating in the sport than when it is a woman or a girl, with an average of 46% vs. 35% of sports-related names for each gender. A computational model trained on these naming data reproduces the bias. We argue that both the data and the model result in representational harm against women.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
The Process of Categorical Clipping at the Core of the Genesis of Concepts in Synthetic Neural Cognition
Words that strongly activate both a lower-layer neuron and its strongly connected upper-layer neuron in GPT-2XL form more semantically similar clusters, which the paper interprets as a clipping process.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.