Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Difference-Masking: Choosing What to Mask in Continued Pretraining

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.14577 v2 pith:SGT7OJVK submitted 2023-05-23 cs.LG cs.CL

classification cs.LGcs.CL
keywords pretrainingcontinuedmaskwhatdifference-maskingdomaindownstreamtask
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The self-supervised objective of masking-and-predicting has led to promising performance gains on a variety of downstream tasks. However, while most approaches randomly mask tokens, there is strong intuition that deciding what to mask can substantially improve learning outcomes. We investigate this in continued pretraining setting in which pretrained models continue to pretrain on domain-specific data before performing some downstream task. We introduce Difference-Masking, a masking strategy that automatically chooses what to mask during continued pretraining by considering what makes a task domain different from the pretraining domain. Empirically, we find that Difference-Masking outperforms baselines on continued pretraining settings across four diverse language-only and multimodal video tasks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools