Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Automated Market Making and Arbitrage Profits in the Presence of Fees

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.14604 v2 pith:246BNPQE submitted 2023-05-24 q-fin.MF math.OCq-fin.PMq-fin.PRq-fin.TR

Automated Market Making and Arbitrage Profits in the Presence of Fees

classification q-fin.MF math.OCq-fin.PMq-fin.PRq-fin.TR
keywords feesarbitrageblockmodelprofitstradingarbitrageursasymptotic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We consider the impact of trading fees on the profits of arbitrageurs trading against an automated market maker (AMM) or, equivalently, on the adverse selection incurred by liquidity providers (LPs) due to arbitrage. We extend the model of Milionis et al. [2022] for a general class of two asset AMMs to introduce both fees and discrete Poisson block generation times. In our setting, we are able to compute the expected instantaneous rate of arbitrage profit in closed form. When the fees are low, in the fast block asymptotic regime, the impact of fees takes a particularly simple form: fees simply scale down arbitrage profits by the fraction of blocks which present profitable trading opportunities to arbitrageurs. This fraction decreases with an increasing block rate, hence our model yields an important practical insight: faster blockchains will result in reduced LP losses. Further introducing gas fees (fixed costs) in our model, we show that, in the fast block asymptotic regime, lower gas fees lead to smaller losses for LPs.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Optimal Dynamic Fees for Automated Market Makers: A Stochastic Control Approach to Loss-Versus-Rebalancing

    q-fin.MF 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Derives a pro-cyclical optimal dynamic fee for AMM LPs via ergodic control that is independent of wealth and risk aversion and improves growth rate over static fees.

  2. Where Does MEV Really Come From? Revisiting CEXDEX Arbitrage on Ethereum

    cs.CR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A new discrete-time AMM model with diffusive plus jump price processes shows CEX-DEX arbitrage requires volumes comparable to major liquidity pools and produces profits on the scale of total MEV.

  3. Multi-Currency AMMs for Decentralized FOREX Markets: Feasibility & Optimal Design

    q-fin.TR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Optimized multi-currency constant-mean AMM pools with correlation-based currency clustering cut modeled FX trading costs by ~13% versus USD vehicle-currency routing.