Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Uncertainty Voting Ensemble for Imbalanced Deep Regression

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.15178 v4 pith:EB6J3GN5 submitted 2023-05-24 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords regressionensembleimbalancedlearninguncertaintydataregionsuvote
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Data imbalance is ubiquitous when applying machine learning to real-world problems, particularly regression problems. If training data are imbalanced, the learning is dominated by the densely covered regions of the target distribution and the learned regressor tends to exhibit poor performance in sparsely covered regions. Beyond standard measures like oversampling or reweighting, there are two main approaches to handling learning from imbalanced data. For regression, recent work leverages the continuity of the distribution, while for classification, the trend has been to use ensemble methods, allowing some members to specialize in predictions for sparser regions. In our method, named UVOTE, we integrate recent advances in probabilistic deep learning with an ensemble approach for imbalanced regression. We replace traditional regression losses with negative log-likelihood, which also predicts sample-wise aleatoric uncertainty. Our experiments show that this loss function handles imbalance better. Additionally, we use the predicted aleatoric uncertainty values to fuse the predictions of different expert models in the ensemble, eliminating the need for a separate aggregation module. We compare our method with existing alternatives on multiple public benchmarks and show that UVOTE consistently outperforms the prior art, while at the same time producing better-calibrated uncertainty estimates. Our code is available at https://github.com/SherryJYC/UVOTE.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Leveraging Group Classification with Descending Soft Labeling for Deep Imbalanced Regression

    cs.LG 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A group-classification plus multi-expert regression framework with symmetric descending soft labels improves deep imbalanced regression on age and text-similarity benchmarks.

  2. Extracting Uncertainty Estimates from Mixtures of Experts for Semantic Segmentation

    cs.CV 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Unmodified mixtures of experts can provide predictive uncertainty estimates via entropy, mutual information, and expert-variance, and these estimates outperform a two-expert average ensemble on conditional correctness...

  3. Mixture of Experts (MoE): A Big Data Perspective

    cs.LG 2025-01 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A survey of MoE methods for big data that catalogs architectures, use cases, and open challenges without adding new results.

Pith tools