Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

OlaGPT: Empowering LLMs With Human-like Problem-Solving Abilities

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.16334 v1 pith:WIXDTFHX submitted 2023-05-23 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords olagptreasoningcognitivehumanframeworklearningabilitiesaspects
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In most current research, large language models (LLMs) are able to perform reasoning tasks by generating chains of thought through the guidance of specific prompts. However, there still exists a significant discrepancy between their capability in solving complex reasoning problems and that of humans. At present, most approaches focus on chains of thought (COT) and tool use, without considering the adoption and application of human cognitive frameworks. It is well-known that when confronting complex reasoning challenges, humans typically employ various cognitive abilities, and necessitate interaction with all aspects of tools, knowledge, and the external environment information to accomplish intricate tasks. This paper introduces a novel intelligent framework, referred to as OlaGPT. OlaGPT carefully studied a cognitive architecture framework, and propose to simulate certain aspects of human cognition. The framework involves approximating different cognitive modules, including attention, memory, reasoning, learning, and corresponding scheduling and decision-making mechanisms. Inspired by the active learning mechanism of human beings, it proposes a learning unit to record previous mistakes and expert opinions, and dynamically refer to them to strengthen their ability to solve similar problems. The paper also outlines common effective reasoning frameworks for human problem-solving and designs Chain-of-Thought (COT) templates accordingly. A comprehensive decision-making mechanism is also proposed to maximize model accuracy. The efficacy of OlaGPT has been stringently evaluated on multiple reasoning datasets, and the experimental outcomes reveal that OlaGPT surpasses state-of-the-art benchmarks, demonstrating its superior performance. Our implementation of OlaGPT is available on GitHub: \url{https://github.com/oladata-team/OlaGPT}.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Toward Structured Knowledge Reasoning: Contrastive Retrieval-Augmented Generation on Experience

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CoRE improves structured knowledge reasoning by retrieving both correct and incorrect past examples into the prompt, using MCTS-generated experience memory.

  2. Industrial brain: a human-like autonomous neuro-symbolic cognitive decision-making system

    cs.AI 2025-06 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    The paper presents an 'industrial brain' framework for supply-chain resilience prediction, but the reported improvements are not supported by the paper's own inconsistent tables and missing baselines.

Pith tools