REVIEW 1 cited by
Benchmarking state-of-the-art gradient boosting algorithms for classification
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This work explores the use of gradient boosting in the context of classification. Four popular implementations, including original GBM algorithm and selected state-of-the-art gradient boosting frameworks (i.e. XGBoost, LightGBM and CatBoost), have been thoroughly compared on several publicly available real-world datasets of sufficient diversity. In the study, special emphasis was placed on hyperparameter optimization, specifically comparing two tuning strategies, i.e. randomized search and Bayesian optimization using the Tree-stuctured Parzen Estimator. The performance of considered methods was investigated in terms of common classification accuracy metrics as well as runtime and tuning time. Additionally, obtained results have been validated using appropriate statistical testing. An attempt was made to indicate a gradient boosting variant showing the right balance between effectiveness, reliability and ease of use.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
eegFloss: A Python package for refining sleep EEG recordings using machine learning models
eegFloss provides an open-source LightGBM classifier that labels 10-second sleep EEG epochs as usable or artifact-contaminated (weighted F1 ≈ 0.85, κ = 0.78) plus an accelerometer-based time-in-bed estimator.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.