REVIEW 2 cited by
Enhanced Chart Understanding in Vision and Language Task via Cross-modal Pre-training on Plot Table Pairs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Building cross-model intelligence that can understand charts and communicate the salient information hidden behind them is an appealing challenge in the vision and language(V+L) community. The capability to uncover the underlined table data of chart figures is a critical key to automatic chart understanding. We introduce ChartT5, a V+L model that learns how to interpret table information from chart images via cross-modal pre-training on plot table pairs. Specifically, we propose two novel pre-training objectives: Masked Header Prediction (MHP) and Masked Value Prediction (MVP) to facilitate the model with different skills to interpret the table information. We have conducted extensive experiments on chart question answering and chart summarization to verify the effectiveness of the proposed pre-training strategies. In particular, on the ChartQA benchmark, our ChartT5 outperforms the state-of-the-art non-pretraining methods by over 8% performance gains.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
In-Depth and In-Breadth: Pre-training Multimodal Language Models Customized for Comprehensive Chart Understanding
ChartScope, using a template-based synthetic data pipeline and dual-path reasoning training, outperforms prior chart-reading models on several advanced chart benchmarks.
-
Chart-to-Experience: Benchmarking Multimodal LLMs for Predicting Experiential Impact of Charts
Multimodal LLMs underperform humans at directly rating charts' experiential impact, but they are substantially better at pairwise comparisons, especially when the human ratings differ clearly.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.