Pith. sign in

REVIEW

How to Construct Perfect and Worse-than-Coin-Flip Spoofing Countermeasures: A Word of Warning on Shortcut Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.00044 v1 pith:LFLGCYRJ submitted 2023-05-31 cs.LG cs.CRcs.SDeess.AS

classification cs.LGcs.CRcs.SDeess.AS
keywords learningshortcutcountermeasuresdatadeepflipmodelsshortcuts
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Shortcut learning, or `Clever Hans effect` refers to situations where a learning agent (e.g., deep neural networks) learns spurious correlations present in data, resulting in biased models. We focus on finding shortcuts in deep learning based spoofing countermeasures (CMs) that predict whether a given utterance is spoofed or not. While prior work has addressed specific data artifacts, such as silence, no general normative framework has been explored for analyzing shortcut learning in CMs. In this study, we propose a generic approach to identifying shortcuts by introducing systematic interventions on the training and test sides, including the boundary cases of `near-perfect` and `worse than coin flip` (label flip). By using three different models, ranging from classic to state-of-the-art, we demonstrate the presence of shortcut learning in five simulated conditions. We analyze the results using a regression model to understand how biases affect the class-conditional score statistics.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools