Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Learning the Pareto Front Using Bootstrapped Observation Samples

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.00096 v2 pith:DNOZSYPH submitted 2023-05-31 stat.ML cs.LG

classification stat.MLcs.LG
keywords paretofrontalgorithmarmscontextoptimalregretalong
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We consider Pareto front identification (PFI) for linear bandits (PFILin), i.e., the goal is to identify a set of arms with undominated mean reward vectors when the mean reward vector is a linear function of the context. PFILin includes the best arm identification problem and multi-objective active learning as special cases. The sample complexity of our proposed algorithm is optimal up to a logarithmic factor. In addition, the regret incurred by our algorithm during the estimation is within a logarithmic factor of the optimal regret among all algorithms that identify the Pareto front. Our key contribution is a new estimator that in every round updates the estimate for the unknown parameter along multiple context directions -- in contrast to the conventional estimator that only updates the parameter estimate along the chosen context. This allows us to use low-regret arms to collect information about Pareto optimal arms. Our key innovation is to reuse the exploration samples multiple times; in contrast to conventional estimators that use each sample only once. Numerical experiments demonstrate that the proposed algorithm successfully identifies the Pareto front while controlling the regret.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Adaptive Data Augmentation for Thompson Sampling

    stat.ML 2025-06 reject novelty 7.0 of 10

    A hypothetical-context estimator is claimed to make Thompson Sampling minimax optimal for linear contextual bandits under arbitrary contexts, though the proof has a critical gap.

  2. Short-Term Pain for Long-Term Gain: Adaptive Experiment with Post-Commitment Reward Shift

    cs.LG 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    RAEC’s predetermined reserved exploration achieves matching minimax regret for post-commitment reward-shift bandits across short-experiment, balanced, and short-commitment regimes.

Pith tools