Pith. sign in

REVIEW

End-to-End Word-Level Pronunciation Assessment with MASK Pre-training

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.02682 v1 pith:SJODMECH submitted 2023-06-05 cs.CL eess.AS

End-to-End Word-Level Pronunciation Assessment with MASK Pre-training

classification cs.CL eess.AS
keywords assessmentphonemepronunciationunderlinewordaligningcomponentsend-to-end
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Pronunciation assessment is a major challenge in the computer-aided pronunciation training system, especially at the word (phoneme)-level. To obtain word (phoneme)-level scores, current methods usually rely on aligning components to obtain acoustic features of each word (phoneme), which limits the performance of assessment to the accuracy of alignments. Therefore, to address this problem, we propose a simple yet effective method, namely \underline{M}asked pre-training for \underline{P}ronunciation \underline{A}ssessment (MPA). Specifically, by incorporating a mask-predict strategy, our MPA supports end-to-end training without leveraging any aligning components and can solve misalignment issues to a large extent during prediction. Furthermore, we design two evaluation strategies to enable our model to conduct assessments in both unsupervised and supervised settings. Experimental results on SpeechOcean762 dataset demonstrate that MPA could achieve better performance than previous methods, without any explicit alignment. In spite of this, MPA still has some limitations, such as requiring more inference time and reference text. They expect to be addressed in future work.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.