Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Language acquisition: do children and language models follow similar learning stages?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.03586 v1 pith:QOZAHQ7A submitted 2023-06-06 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords languagechildrenlearningmodelsacquisitionstagesduringfirst
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

During language acquisition, children follow a typical sequence of learning stages, whereby they first learn to categorize phonemes before they develop their lexicon and eventually master increasingly complex syntactic structures. However, the computational principles that lead to this learning trajectory remain largely unknown. To investigate this, we here compare the learning trajectories of deep language models to those of children. Specifically, we test whether, during its training, GPT-2 exhibits stages of language acquisition comparable to those observed in children aged between 18 months and 6 years. For this, we train 48 GPT-2 models from scratch and evaluate their syntactic and semantic abilities at each training step, using 96 probes curated from the BLiMP, Zorro and BIG-Bench benchmarks. We then compare these evaluations with the behavior of 54 children during language production. Our analyses reveal three main findings. First, similarly to children, the language models tend to learn linguistic skills in a systematic order. Second, this learning scheme is parallel: the language tasks that are learned last improve from the very first training steps. Third, some - but not all - learning stages are shared between children and these language models. Overall, these results shed new light on the principles of language acquisition, and highlight important divergences in how humans and modern algorithms learn to process natural language.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Unraveling Syntax: Language Modeling and the Substructure of Grammars

    cs.CL 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Language-modeling loss decomposes linearly over the sub-grammars of a probabilistic context-free grammar, and models learn these sub-grammars in parallel rather than in stages.

  2. ChemActor: Enhancing Automated Extraction of Chemical Synthesis Actions with LLM-Generated Data

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A fine-tuned LLaMA-2-7B model trained with selected LLM-generated data improves extraction of chemical synthesis actions from experimental text.

Pith tools