REVIEW 1 cited by
Normalization Layers Are All That Sharpness-Aware Minimization Needs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Sharpness-aware minimization (SAM) was proposed to reduce sharpness of minima and has been shown to enhance generalization performance in various settings. In this work we show that perturbing only the affine normalization parameters (typically comprising 0.1% of the total parameters) in the adversarial step of SAM can outperform perturbing all of the parameters.This finding generalizes to different SAM variants and both ResNet (Batch Normalization) and Vision Transformer (Layer Normalization) architectures. We consider alternative sparse perturbation approaches and find that these do not achieve similar performance enhancement at such extreme sparsity levels, showing that this behaviour is unique to the normalization layers. Although our findings reaffirm the effectiveness of SAM in improving generalization performance, they cast doubt on whether this is solely caused by reduced sharpness.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Adapter Naturally Serves as Decoupler for Cross-Domain Few-Shot Semantic Segmentation
A residual adapter called DFN plus singular-value sharpness regularization improves cross-domain few-shot segmentation by 2.69% and 4.68% MIoU over prior state-of-the-art in 1-shot and 5-shot settings.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.