Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics · arXiv:2306.06049 v1 · submitted 9 Jun 2023
Cross correlations of the CMB Doppler mode and the 21 cm brightness temperature in the presence of a primordial magnetic field
The paper says
“In particular the latter in combination with SKA1-mid shows promising signal-over-noise ratios.”
from the abstract · picked out as the main claim by a classifier
Reviews
Reviews by people
No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.
The paper
Abstract
The cross correlation between the CMB Doppler mode and the 21 cm line brightness temperature is calculated in the presence of a stochastic primordial magnetic field. Potential detectability is estimated for Planck 2018 bestfit parameters in combination with configuration and survey design parameters of 21 cm line radio telescopes such as LOFAR and the future SKAO. Homogeneous as well as inhomogeneous reionization has been considered. In particular the latter in combination with SKA1-mid shows promising signal-over-noise ratios.
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
How the main claim is stated: asserted 0.54
What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.19 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.06 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.12 · compares with prior results 0.10 · mentions code or data availability 0.02
The abstract, sentence by sentence
This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v1). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.
| Sentence | Role | The authors' own work | States the main conclusion | Strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The cross correlation between the CMB Doppler mode and the 21 cm line brightness temperature is calculated in the presence of a stochastic primordial magnetic field. | contribution 0.95 | 0.89 | 0.10 | asserted 1.00 |
| Potential detectability is estimated for Planck 2018 bestfit parameters in combination with configuration and survey design parameters of 21 cm line radio telescopes such as LOFAR and the future SKAO. | method 0.70 | 0.83 | 0.11 | asserted 0.79 |
| Homogeneous as well as inhomogeneous reionization has been considered. | method 0.91 | 0.75 | 0.04 | asserted 0.96 |
| In particular the latter in combination with SKA1-mid shows promising signal-over-noise ratios. | result 0.61 | 0.83 | 0.58 | asserted 0.54 |
What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.91 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.77
What was examined, and what was not
Sources read
- arXiv listing abstract v1
Not examined
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
Levels run
- P abstract
Not run
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
How the labels were made
Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,586 input tokens.
Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON
Cited by 1 Pith paper
Reviewed papers on Pith that cite this one. The full citation record
How the literature uses it
3 arXiv papers cite this in 3 sentences
Papers citing it · 2 sentences without a confident label
Cites it as background 1 paper
-
This exciting signal has the potential to expand our knowledge on the formation mechanism of the first galaxies [ref] , the thermal history of the intergalactic medium (IGM) [ref] , the epoch of reionization [ref] , physics beyond the standard model [ref] , and possibly shed some light on the nature of dark matter [ref] .
Does it matter? A more careful treatment of density fluctuations in 21-cm simulations · Introduction · 0.88
Challenges and discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment.
Come back by email
A short list of the week's newly reviewed papers. Nothing is sent until you confirm from your inbox, and every email has a link that stops it. No account.
No comments yet.
Sign in to comment