REVIEW 2 cited by
TWIGMA: A dataset of AI-Generated Images with Metadata From Twitter
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
TWIGMA: A dataset of AI-Generated Images with Metadata From Twitter
read the original abstract
Recent progress in generative artificial intelligence (gen-AI) has enabled the generation of photo-realistic and artistically-inspiring photos at a single click, catering to millions of users online. To explore how people use gen-AI models such as DALLE and StableDiffusion, it is critical to understand the themes, contents, and variations present in the AI-generated photos. In this work, we introduce TWIGMA (TWItter Generative-ai images with MetadatA), a comprehensive dataset encompassing over 800,000 gen-AI images collected from Jan 2021 to March 2023 on Twitter, with associated metadata (e.g., tweet text, creation date, number of likes), available at https://zenodo.org/records/8031785. Through a comparative analysis of TWIGMA with natural images and human artwork, we find that gen-AI images possess distinctive characteristics and exhibit, on average, lower variability when compared to their non-gen-AI counterparts. Additionally, we find that the similarity between a gen-AI image and natural images is inversely correlated with the number of likes. Finally, we observe a longitudinal shift in the themes of AI-generated images on Twitter, with users increasingly sharing artistically sophisticated content such as intricate human portraits, whereas their interest in simple subjects such as natural scenes and animals has decreased. Our findings underscore the significance of TWIGMA as a unique data resource for studying AI-generated images.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
A Comprehensive Dataset for Human vs. AI Generated Image Detection
MS COCOAI provides 96,000 caption-aligned real and synthetic images from five generators, with baseline scores of about 0.80 for real-vs-AI detection and 0.45 for generator attribution.
-
Navigating the Challenges of AI-Generated Image Detection in the Wild: What Truly Matters?
The ITW-SM dataset and targeted optimization of detector design choices yield a 26.87% average AUC improvement for state-of-the-art AI-generated image detectors under real-world social media conditions.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.