Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Knowledge Guided Representation Learning and Causal Structure Learning in Soil Science

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.09302 v1 pith:44F5JNQV submitted 2023-06-15 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords soilcausallearningprocessesdataobservedframeworkrepresentation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

An improved understanding of soil can enable more sustainable land-use practices. Nevertheless, soil is called a complex, living medium due to the complex interaction of different soil processes that limit our understanding of soil. Process-based models and analyzing observed data provide two avenues for improving our understanding of soil processes. Collecting observed data is cost-prohibitive but reflects real-world behavior, while process-based models can be used to generate ample synthetic data which may not be representative of reality. We propose a framework, knowledge-guided representation learning, and causal structure learning (KGRCL), to accelerate scientific discoveries in soil science. The framework improves representation learning for simulated soil processes via conditional distribution matching with observed soil processes. Simultaneously, the framework leverages both observed and simulated data to learn a causal structure among the soil processes. The learned causal graph is more representative of ground truth than other graphs generated from other causal discovery methods. Furthermore, the learned causal graph is leveraged in a supervised learning setup to predict the impact of fertilizer use and changing weather on soil carbon. We present the results in five different locations to show the improvement in the prediction performance in out-of-sample and few-shots setting.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Positive-Unlabeled Learning for Control Group Construction in Observational Causal Inference

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Using only treated units and an unlabeled pool, positive-unlabeled learning can select control groups whose ATE estimates match the true effect in simulations and two agricultural case studies.

  2. Enabling Adoption of Regenerative Agriculture through Soil Carbon Copilots

    cs.IR 2024-11 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A retrieval-augmented LLM copilot ingests soil, weather, and farm-management data to produce county-level narratives about soil organic carbon change in California.

Pith tools