REVIEW 2 cited by
Clickbait Detection via Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Clickbait, which aims to induce users with some surprising and even thrilling headlines for increasing click-through rates, permeates almost all online content publishers, such as news portals and social media. Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as a powerful instrument and achieved tremendous success in a series of NLP downstream tasks. However, it is not yet known whether LLMs can be served as a high-quality clickbait detection system. In this paper, we analyze the performance of LLMs in the few-shot and zero-shot scenarios on several English and Chinese benchmark datasets. Experimental results show that LLMs cannot achieve the best results compared to the state-of-the-art deep and fine-tuning PLMs methods. Different from human intuition, the experiments demonstrated that LLMs cannot make satisfied clickbait detection just by the headlines.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
What Makes You CLIC: Detection of Croatian Clickbait Headlines
CLIC, a new 2,907-headline Croatian clickbait dataset, shows about 53% of sampled headlines are clickbait and fine-tuned BERTić (F1 0.78) beats zero/few-shot LLMs on detection.
-
Web-Browsing LLMs Can Access Social Media Profiles and Infer User Demographics
Web-browsing LLMs can retrieve X profile content and infer demographics with above-chance accuracy in some cases, but the study's evidence is partly confounded by training-data memorization and a heavily reduced synth...
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.