REVIEW 1 cited by
All-in-SAM: from Weak Annotation to Pixel-wise Nuclei Segmentation with Prompt-based Finetuning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The Segment Anything Model (SAM) is a recently proposed prompt-based segmentation model in a generic zero-shot segmentation approach. With the zero-shot segmentation capacity, SAM achieved impressive flexibility and precision on various segmentation tasks. However, the current pipeline requires manual prompts during the inference stage, which is still resource intensive for biomedical image segmentation. In this paper, instead of using prompts during the inference stage, we introduce a pipeline that utilizes the SAM, called all-in-SAM, through the entire AI development workflow (from annotation generation to model finetuning) without requiring manual prompts during the inference stage. Specifically, SAM is first employed to generate pixel-level annotations from weak prompts (e.g., points, bounding box). Then, the pixel-level annotations are used to finetune the SAM segmentation model rather than training from scratch. Our experimental results reveal two key findings: 1) the proposed pipeline surpasses the state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods in a nuclei segmentation task on the public Monuseg dataset, and 2) the utilization of weak and few annotations for SAM finetuning achieves competitive performance compared to using strong pixel-wise annotated data.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Prompt Engineering in Segment Anything Model: Methodologies, Applications, and Emerging Challenges
A structured survey of prompt engineering methods for the Segment Anything Model, covering geometric, textual, and multimodal prompts and their applications.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.