Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Predicting beauty, liking, and aesthetic quality: A comparative analysis of image databases for visual aesthetics research

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.00984 v1 pith:T3LHY7OM submitted 2023-07-03 cs.CV cs.DB

Predicting beauty, liking, and aesthetic quality: A comparative analysis of image databases for visual aesthetics research

classification cs.CV cs.DB
keywords datasetsimageaestheticratingsaestheticsdifferentresearchacross
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In the fields of Experimental and Computational Aesthetics, numerous image datasets have been created over the last two decades. In the present work, we provide a comparative overview of twelve image datasets that include aesthetic ratings (beauty, liking or aesthetic quality) and investigate the reproducibility of results across different datasets. Specifically, we examine how consistently the ratings can be predicted by using either (A) a set of 20 previously studied statistical image properties, or (B) the layers of a convolutional neural network developed for object recognition. Our findings reveal substantial variation in the predictability of aesthetic ratings across the different datasets. However, consistent similarities were found for datasets containing either photographs or paintings, suggesting different relevant features in the aesthetic evaluation of these two image genres. To our surprise, statistical image properties and the convolutional neural network predict aesthetic ratings with similar accuracy, highlighting a significant overlap in the image information captured by the two methods. Nevertheless, the discrepancies between the datasets call into question the generalizability of previous research findings on single datasets. Our study underscores the importance of considering multiple datasets to improve the validity and generalizability of research results in the fields of experimental and computational aesthetics.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.