Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Analyzing the vulnerabilities in SplitFed Learning: Assessing the robustness against Data Poisoning Attacks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.03197 v1 pith:4BOK2OSU submitted 2023-07-04 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords learningattacksattackstrategiespoisoningclassifierclientsdata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Distributed Collaborative Machine Learning (DCML) is a potential alternative to address the privacy concerns associated with centralized machine learning. The Split learning (SL) and Federated Learning (FL) are the two effective learning approaches in DCML. Recently there have been an increased interest on the hybrid of FL and SL known as the SplitFed Learning (SFL). This research is the earliest attempt to study, analyze and present the impact of data poisoning attacks in SFL. We propose three kinds of novel attack strategies namely untargeted, targeted and distance-based attacks for SFL. All the attacks strategies aim to degrade the performance of the DCML-based classifier. We test the proposed attack strategies for two different case studies on Electrocardiogram signal classification and automatic handwritten digit recognition. A series of attack experiments were conducted by varying the percentage of malicious clients and the choice of the model split layer between the clients and the server. The results after the comprehensive analysis of attack strategies clearly convey that untargeted and distance-based poisoning attacks have greater impacts in evading the classifier outcomes compared to targeted attacks in SFL

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Taxonomy of Attacks and Defenses in Split Learning

    cs.CR 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A structured review that classifies split learning attacks and defenses into a three-axis taxonomy (strategy, constraints, effectiveness) and identifies research gaps.

Pith tools