REVIEW 1 cited by
Astrometry with Extended-Path Intensity Correlation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Intensity interferometry -- the correlation of spatially separated light intensities -- has historically been an important tool for precision optical astronomical observations. However, due to the extremely narrow field of view, its scope has been limited to studies of the morphology of very bright emission regions, primarily determinations of angular diameters of nearby hot stars. We propose adding an adjustable path extension into the detector optics which creates a primary interference fringe for widely separated sources, allowing maximum source separations parametrically larger than the angular resolution. This Extended-Path Intensity Correlator (EPIC), augmented with advances in single-photon detectors and spectroscopic gratings, would enable ground-based astrometry at microarcsecond-level precision in a field of view as large as several arcseconds. EPIC has the potential to revolutionize astrophysical and cosmological observations requiring high-precision differential astrometry on sources of high surface brightness. We outline how EPIC can be employed to detect the astrometric wobble of Earth-like planets around Sun-like stars at tens to hundreds of parsecs, and expect that EPIC's larger field of view will expand the power of intensity interferometry to a broad range of astronomical applications.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Expanding Ejecta Method: II. Framework for Cosmological Distance Measurements via Intensity Interferometry
Geometric supernova distances from intensity interferometry could calibrate the distance ladder and measure H0 to between 0.4% and 9% depending on instrument capability and application, all without luminosity calibration.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.