REVIEW 1 cited by
Probabilistic Test-Time Generalization by Variational Neighbor-Labeling
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This paper strives for domain generalization, where models are trained exclusively on source domains before being deployed on unseen target domains. We follow the strict separation of source training and target testing, but exploit the value of the unlabeled target data itself during inference. We make three contributions. First, we propose probabilistic pseudo-labeling of target samples to generalize the source-trained model to the target domain at test time. We formulate the generalization at test time as a variational inference problem, by modeling pseudo labels as distributions, to consider the uncertainty during generalization and alleviate the misleading signal of inaccurate pseudo labels. Second, we learn variational neighbor labels that incorporate the information of neighboring target samples to generate more robust pseudo labels. Third, to learn the ability to incorporate more representative target information and generate more precise and robust variational neighbor labels, we introduce a meta-generalization stage during training to simulate the generalization procedure. Experiments on seven widely-used datasets demonstrate the benefits, abilities, and effectiveness of our proposal.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
SynthGenNet: a self-supervised approach for test-time generalization using synthetic multi-source domain mixing of street view images
SynthGenNet reports 49.79 mIoU on IDD and 48.33 on Cityscapes by mixing multiple synthetic sources with diverse self-supervised losses, but the method actually uses unlabeled target images during training, so it is no...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.