Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Designing Secure Interconnects for Modern Microelectronics: From SoCs to Emerging Chiplet-Based Architectures

Cryptography and Security · Submitted 11 Jul 2023

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Experimental results demonstrate the practicality of these approaches for high-security applications, ensuring trust and reliability in monolithic and modular systems.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2307.05815 (version 2)
Pith ID777I7FP2, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationDipal Halder. "Designing Secure Interconnects for Modern Microelectronics: From SoCs to Emerging Chiplet-Based Architectures." arXiv:2307.05815 (2023). https://pith.science/paper/777I7FP2
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,011 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.09 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.06 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.05 · compares with prior results 0.21 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

The globalization of semiconductor supply chains has exposed Network-on-Chip (NoC) interconnects in System-on-Chip (SoC) architectures to critical security risks, including reverse engineering and IP theft. To address these threats, this work builds on two methodologies: ObNoCs [11], which obfuscates NoC topologies using programmable multiplexers, and POTENT [10], which enhances post-synthesis security against SAT-based attacks. These techniques ensure robust protection of NoC interconnects with minimal performance overhead. As the industry shifts to chiplet-based heterogeneous architectures, this research extends ObNoCs and POTENT to secure intra- and inter-chiplet interconnects. New challenges, such as safeguarding inter-chiplet communication and interposer design, are addressed through enhanced obfuscation, authentication, and encryption mechanisms. Experimental results demonstrate the practicality of these approaches for high-security applications, ensuring trust and reliability in monolithic and modular systems.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 The globalization of semiconductor supply chains has exposed Network-on-Chip (NoC) interconnects in System-on-Chip (SoC) architectures to critical security risks, including reverse engineering and IP theft. background 1.00 0.05 0.03 asserted 1.00
s1 To address these threats, this work builds on two methodologies: ObNoCs [11], which obfuscates NoC topologies using programmable multiplexers, and POTENT [10], which enhances post-synthesis security against SAT-based attacks. method 0.61 0.38 0.05 asserted 0.99
s2 These techniques ensure robust protection of NoC interconnects with minimal performance overhead. result 0.48 0.42 0.27 asserted 1.00
s3 As the industry shifts to chiplet-based heterogeneous architectures, this research extends ObNoCs and POTENT to secure intra- and inter-chiplet interconnects. contribution 0.99 0.74 0.09 asserted 1.00
s4 New challenges, such as safeguarding inter-chiplet communication and interposer design, are addressed through enhanced obfuscation, authentication, and encryption mechanisms. contribution 0.76 0.71 0.09 asserted 1.00
s5 Experimental results demonstrate the practicality of these approaches for high-security applications, ensuring trust and reliability in monolithic and modular systems. result 0.67 0.91 0.70 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.76.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

The globalization of semiconductor supply chains has exposed Network-on-Chip (NoC) interconnects in System-on-Chip (SoC) architectures to critical security risks, including reverse engineering and IP theft. To address these threats, this work builds on two methodologies: ObNoCs [11], which obfuscates NoC topologies using programmable multiplexers, and POTENT [10], which enhances post-synthesis security against SAT-based attacks. These techniques ensure robust protection of NoC interconnects with minimal performance overhead. As the industry shifts to chiplet-based heterogeneous architectures, this research extends ObNoCs and POTENT to secure intra- and inter-chiplet interconnects. New challenges, such as safeguarding inter-chiplet communication and interposer design, are addressed through enhanced obfuscation, authentication, and encryption mechanisms. Experimental results demonstrate the practicality of these approaches for high-security applications, ensuring trust and reliability in monolithic and modular systems.

Human review
How the literature uses it

1 arXiv paper cite this in 1 sentence

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.