Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Empirical radius formulas for canonical neutron stars from bidirectionally selecting EOS features in extended Bayesian analyses of observational data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.05848 v2 pith:P7MIDEC6 submitted 2023-07-11 nucl-th astro-ph.HEnucl-ex

classification nucl-thastro-ph.HEnucl-ex
keywords bayesiannuclearparametersregressionselectionanalysescanonicaldata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Given the significant advancement in Bayesian inference of nuclear Equation of State (EOS) from gravitational wave and X-ray observations of neutron stars (NSs), especially since GW170817, is there a data-driven and robust empirical formula for the radius $R_{1.4}$ of canonical NSs in terms of the characteristic EOS parameters (features)? What is the single most important but currently poorly known EOS parameter for determining the $R_{1.4}$? We study these questions by extending the traditional Bayesian analysis which normally ends at presenting the marginalized posterior probability distribution functions (PDFs) of individual EOS parameters and their correlations (or sometimes only the Pearson correlation coefficients which are only reliably useful when the variables are linearly correlated while they are actually often not). Using three regression model-building methodologies: bidirectional step-wise feature selection, Least Absolute Shrinkage Selection Operator (LASSO) regression, and neural network regression on a large set of posterior EOSs and the corresponding $R_{1.4}$ values inferred from earlier comprehensive Bayesian analyses of NS observational data, we systematically and rigorously develop the most probable $R_{1.4}$ formulas with varying statistical accuracy and technical complexity. The most important EOS parameters for determining $R_{1.4}$ are found consistently in each of the feature/model selection processes to be (in order of decreasing importance): curvature $K_{sym}$, slope $L$, skewness $J_{sym}$ of nuclear symmetry energy, skewness $J_{0}$, incompressibility $K_{0}$ of symmetric nuclear matter, and the magnitude $E_{sym} (\rho_0)$ of symmetry energy at the saturation density $\rho_0$ of nuclear matter.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Fast and Accurate Prediction of Neutron Star Structure with Deep Neural Networks

    astro-ph.HE 2026-08 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    Feedforward and residual neural networks predict neutron star observables from piecewise polytropic EOS parameters with R^2>0.999 and a ~200x speedup over direct TOV integration.

Pith tools