Pith. sign in

REVIEW

From Multilayer Perceptron to GPT: A Reflection on Deep Learning Research for Wireless Physical Layer

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.07359 v1 pith:WTN5SEGC submitted 2023-07-14 cs.IT math.IT

From Multilayer Perceptron to GPT: A Reflection on Deep Learning Research for Wireless Physical Layer

classification cs.IT math.IT
keywords wirelessresearchcommunicationcommunicationslayermodelsphysicaldeep
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Most research studies on deep learning (DL) applied to the physical layer of wireless communication do not put forward the critical role of the accuracy-generalization trade-off in developing and evaluating practical algorithms. To highlight the disadvantage of this common practice, we revisit a data decoding example from one of the first papers introducing DL-based end-to-end wireless communication systems to the research community and promoting the use of artificial intelligence (AI)/DL for the wireless physical layer. We then put forward two key trade-offs in designing DL models for communication, namely, accuracy versus generalization and compression versus latency. We discuss their relevance in the context of wireless communications use cases using emerging DL models including large language models (LLMs). Finally, we summarize our proposed evaluation guidelines to enhance the research impact of DL on wireless communications. These guidelines are an attempt to reconcile the empirical nature of DL research with the rigorous requirement metrics of wireless communications systems.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.