Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

A DPLL(T) Framework for Verifying Deep Neural Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.10266 v3 pith:YITB3O2M submitted 2023-07-17 cs.LG cs.LOcs.SE

classification cs.LGcs.LOcs.SE
keywords verificationapproachapproachesclausedeepdnnsdplllearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) have emerged as an effective approach to tackling real-world problems. However, like human-written software, DNNs can have bugs and can be attacked. To address this, research has explored a wide-range of algorithmic approaches to verify DNN behavior. In this work, we introduce NeuralSAT, a new verification approach that adapts the widely-used DPLL(T) algorithm used in modern SMT solvers. A key feature of SMT solvers is the use of conflict clause learning and search restart to scale verification. Unlike prior DNN verification approaches, NeuralSAT combines an abstraction-based deductive theory solver with clause learning and an evaluation clearly demonstrates the benefits of the approach on a set of challenging verification benchmarks.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Privacy-Preserving Robustness Verification for Neural Networks

    cs.CR 2026-07 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    SecureCROWN enables privacy-preserving neural network robustness verification via secure two-party computation, eliminating data-dependent branching using ReLU arithmetic and Newton-Raphson refinement.

  2. Stress-Testing Neural Network Verifiers with Provably Robust Instances

    cs.LG 2026-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A reusable framework generates verification instances with provably known robustness labels, revealing numeric tolerance issues and bugs in five verifiers while introducing difficulty profiles to diagnose failure modes.

  3. IoUCert: Robustness Verification for Anchor-based Object Detectors

    cs.LG 2026-03 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    IoUCert derives exact IoU bounds over anchor-offset boxes via a coordinate transformation and uses them to formally verify single-object SSD, YOLOv2, and YOLOv3 models under brightness, contrast, and motion-blur pertu...

  4. Influence-Guided Concolic Testing of Transformer Robustness

    cs.SE 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SHAP-based branch prioritization lets a concolic tester find subtle one-pixel attacks on small Transformer classifiers, but the reported evidence is mixed and the abstract overstates results.

Pith tools