Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Deceptive Alignment Monitoring

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.10569 v2 pith:ULNIQ5YU submitted 2023-07-20 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords alignmentdeceptivelearningmachinemodelsmonitoringdirectionsemerging
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

As the capabilities of large machine learning models continue to grow, and as the autonomy afforded to such models continues to expand, the spectre of a new adversary looms: the models themselves. The threat that a model might behave in a seemingly reasonable manner, while secretly and subtly modifying its behavior for ulterior reasons is often referred to as deceptive alignment in the AI Safety & Alignment communities. Consequently, we call this new direction Deceptive Alignment Monitoring. In this work, we identify emerging directions in diverse machine learning subfields that we believe will become increasingly important and intertwined in the near future for deceptive alignment monitoring, and we argue that advances in these fields present both long-term challenges and new research opportunities. We conclude by advocating for greater involvement by the adversarial machine learning community in these emerging directions.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Adversarial Attacks on Robotic Vision Language Action Models

    cs.RO 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Text-based adversarial suffixes can make OpenVLA robot policies elicit chosen target actions with over 90% success on one-hot targets and persist across rollout steps.

  2. Bridging Distribution Shift and AI Safety: Conceptual and Methodological Synergies

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The paper proposes a one-to-one mapping between six causes of distribution shift and several AI safety issues, arguing for mutual method transfer through aligned definitions.

Pith tools