Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A Survey of What to Share in Federated Learning: Perspectives on Model Utility, Privacy Leakage, and Communication Efficiency

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.10655 v2 pith:CVUXUV6O submitted 2023-07-20 cs.LG cs.CR

classification cs.LGcs.CR
keywords methodsmodelshareprivacysharingcommunicationleakagelearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Federated learning (FL) has emerged as a secure paradigm for collaborative training among clients. Without data centralization, FL allows clients to share local information in a privacy-preserving manner. This approach has gained considerable attention, promoting numerous surveys to summarize the related works. However, the majority of these surveys concentrate on FL methods that share model parameters during the training process, while overlooking the possibility of sharing local information in other forms. In this paper, we present a systematic survey from a new perspective of what to share in FL, with an emphasis on the model utility, privacy leakage, and communication efficiency. First, we present a new taxonomy of FL methods in terms of three sharing methods, which respectively share model, synthetic data, and knowledge. Second, we analyze the vulnerability of different sharing methods to privacy attacks and review the defense mechanisms. Third, we conduct extensive experiments to compare the learning performance and communication overhead of various sharing methods in FL. Besides, we assess the potential privacy leakage through model inversion and membership inference attacks, while comparing the effectiveness of various defense approaches. Finally, we identify future research directions and conclude the survey.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Federated Learning from Molecules to Processes: A Perspective

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Federated learning lets chemical companies train shared models on private data, and two case studies show it approaches centralized accuracy while outperforming isolated training.

  2. One-shot Federated Learning via Synthetic Distiller-Distillate Communication

    cs.LG 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    FedSD2C beats prior one-shot federated learning baselines on ImageNette, Tiny-ImageNet, and OpenImage by sending compact latent codes of selected, Fourier-perturbed images instead of local models.

Pith tools