Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Fairness of ChatGPT and the Role Of Explainable-Guided Prompts

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.11761 v1 pith:WROCPO25 submitted 2023-07-14 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords llmsmodelsfairnesslesspotentialpromptsrisktasks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Our research investigates the potential of Large-scale Language Models (LLMs), specifically OpenAI's GPT, in credit risk assessment-a binary classification task. Our findings suggest that LLMs, when directed by judiciously designed prompts and supplemented with domain-specific knowledge, can parallel the performance of traditional Machine Learning (ML) models. Intriguingly, they achieve this with significantly less data-40 times less, utilizing merely 20 data points compared to the ML's 800. LLMs particularly excel in minimizing false positives and enhancing fairness, both being vital aspects of risk analysis. While our results did not surpass those of classical ML models, they underscore the potential of LLMs in analogous tasks, laying a groundwork for future explorations into harnessing the capabilities of LLMs in diverse ML tasks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Comparing Credit Risk Estimates in the Gen-AI Era

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Few-shot GPT-4o underperforms logistic regression and KNN on German Credit Data across all tested prompt and example-selection configurations.

Pith tools