REVIEW 2 cited by
How to use LLMs for Text Analysis
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This guide introduces Large Language Models (LLM) as a highly versatile text analysis method within the social sciences. As LLMs are easy-to-use, cheap, fast, and applicable on a broad range of text analysis tasks, ranging from text annotation and classification to sentiment analysis and critical discourse analysis, many scholars believe that LLMs will transform how we do text analysis. This how-to guide is aimed at students and researchers with limited programming experience, and offers a simple introduction to how LLMs can be used for text analysis in your own research project, as well as advice on best practices. We will go through each of the steps of analyzing textual data with LLMs using Python: installing the software, setting up the API, loading the data, developing an analysis prompt, analyzing the text, and validating the results. As an illustrative example, we will use the challenging task of identifying populism in political texts, and show how LLMs move beyond the existing state-of-the-art.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
From Assistance to Autonomy -- A Researcher Study on the Potential of AI Support for Qualitative Data Analysis
Interviews with 15 HCI researchers show openness to AI in qualitative data analysis under conditions of privacy, control, and reliability, leading to a framework of AI involvement levels from minimal to high.
-
Artificially intelligent agents in the social and behavioral sciences: A history and outlook
AI and social science have co-evolved for 75 years through rapid technological adoption and slower scientific consolidation, with direct human-focused AI studies still scarce.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.